"How Much Injury Is Required Before Self-Defense is Justified?"

Andrew Branca analyzes the law and the evidence in the Zimmerman trial.

The very idea that the State is seeking to establish – that self-defense is conditional upon actually suffering serious injury – is, of course, ridiculous on its face. The purpose of the law of self-defense, particularly in the context of the use deadly defensive force, is to be able to protect yourself from an imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm before that harm occurs, not to require that you actually experience death or grave bodily harm before you may act to protect yourself.

Also, Branca is following the trial live today here.